P.S. Hingna vs Oshish Pandurangji Bhagat Advocate - Bhushan H.Naik — 1033/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,270. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150016932021
e-Filing Number
28-09-2021
Filing Number
1553/2021
Filing Date
28-09-2021
Registration No
1033/2021
Registration Date
28-09-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
327
Police Station
Hingana
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S. Hingna
Respondent(s)
Oshish Pandurangji Bhagat Advocate - Bhushan H.Naik
Dharampal Gulabrao Moon
Adv. Bhushan Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Hingana First Class Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 188 and 270, Disaster Management Act Section 51-B, and Epidemic Diseases Act Section 3, finding insufficient evidence to prove they violated COVID-19 lockdown orders by operating a eatery and serving alcohol during the lockdown period in July 2021. The court determined that the procedural requirements for filing such cases were not met and that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The Hingana First Class Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 188 and 270, Disaster Management Act Section 51-B, and Epidemic Diseases Act Section 3, finding insufficient evidence to prove they violated COVID-19 lockdown orders by operating a eatery and serving alcohol during the lockdown period in July 2021. The court determined that the procedural requirements for filing such cases were not met and that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts