P.S. Hingna vs Oshish Pandurangji Bhagat Advocate - Bhushan H.Naik — 1033/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,270. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150016932021
e-Filing Number
28-09-2021
Filing Number
1553/2021
Filing Date
28-Sep-2021
Registration No
1033/2021
Registration Date
28-Sep-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
327
Police Station
Hingana
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.S. Hingna
Respondent(s)
-
1.Oshish Pandurangji Bhagat Advocate - Bhushan H.Naik
-
2.Dharampal Gulabrao Moon
Adv. Bhushan Naik
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The Hingana First Class Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 188 and 270, Disaster Management Act Section 51-B, and Epidemic Diseases Act Section 3, finding insufficient evidence to prove they violated COVID-19 lockdown orders by operating a eatery and serving alcohol during the lockdown period in July 2021. The court determined that the procedural requirements for filing such cases were not met and that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
27-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Apr-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
16-Dec-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Sep-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
26-Jun-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
06-Apr-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
12-Jan-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
19-Nov-2022
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
05-Sep-2022
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
06-Jun-2022
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
10-Mar-2022
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
29-Dec-2021
N.B.W._Ready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
28-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 1033/2021
Court Judgment Summary The Hingana First Class Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under IPC Sections 188 and 270, Disaster Management Act Section 51-B, and Epidemic Diseases Act Section 3, finding insufficient evidence to prove they violated COVID-19 lockdown orders by operating a eatery and serving alcohol during the lockdown period in July 2021. The court determined that the procedural requirements for filing such cases were not met and that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts