Kapurchand Hakim Pawar vs Smt. Gangabai Premlal Pawar Advocate - Tufan Kamble — 27/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG150008712022
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
70/2022
Filing Date
28-03-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
28-03-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kapurchand Hakim Pawar
Adv. M. B. Koramkar
Respondent(s)
Smt. Gangabai Premlal Pawar Advocate - Tufan Kamble
Priyanka Shrikant Goraman
Shital Rahul Rajput
Monika Premlal Pawar
Sau. Salina Raja Rajput
Karishma Premlal Pawar
Sajan Radheshyam Pawar
Adv. Tufan Kamble
Satyapal Radheshyam Pawar
Adv. Tufan Kamble
Sau. Amita Bhage Bhosale
Sau. Chaina Radheshyam Pawar
Adv. Tufan Kamble
Fulchand, Hingna, Nagpur
Aarju Rajput Pawar
Sau. Netabai Rajput Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA
Awaiting Summons
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 07-04-2026 | Amended Plaint | |
| 10-03-2026 | Amended Plaint | |
| 09-02-2026 | Amended Plaint | |
| 20-01-2026 | Amended Plaint |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by the plaintiff (Kupurchan v. Gangabai) seeking declaratory relief regarding disputed agricultural property has been allowed/granted. The court found the plaintiff has a prima facie case and established rights over the joint Hindu property in question. The defendants are restrained from making any transfers of the disputed land (measuring 44 sq.r. and 2.00 hectares in Ambazari, Nagpur), and the plaintiff is directed to proceed with the original suit on merits pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by the plaintiff (Kupurchan v. Gangabai) seeking declaratory relief regarding disputed agricultural property has been allowed/granted. The court found the plaintiff has a prima facie case and established rights over the joint Hindu property in question. The defendants are restrained from making any transfers of the disputed land (measuring 44 sq.r. and 2.00 hectares in Ambazari, Nagpur), and the plaintiff is directed to proceed with the original suit on merits pending final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts