Police Station MIDC vs Bhart Rameshwar Dumre — 663/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150008382026

Filing Number

754/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

663/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhart Rameshwar Dumre

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary (663/2026): The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Bhart Rameshwar Dumre under Section 252 of Cr.P.C and Section 4/21 of COTPA Act 2003 for smoking in a public place on 11.3.26. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with default simple imprisonment for two days, the court considering the nature of the offence warranted this lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 663/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (663/2026): The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Bhart Rameshwar Dumre under Section 252 of Cr.P.C and Section 4/21 of COTPA Act 2003 for smoking in a public place on 11.3.26. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with default simple imprisonment for two days, the court considering the nature of the offence warranted this lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case