Police Station MIDC vs Shyam sundar Motiram Kadu — 651/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150008262026

Filing Number

742/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

651/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shyam sundar Motiram Kadu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In Case 651/2026, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Shyam Sundar Motiram Kadu for smoking in a public place at MIDC on 11/3/26, an offence under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court, considering the nature of the offence and his plea for leniency, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 651/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 651/2026, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Shyam Sundar Motiram Kadu for smoking in a public place at MIDC on 11/3/26, an offence under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court, considering the nature of the offence and his plea for leniency, sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case