Police Station MIDC vs Abhay Sofilal Borkar — 625/2026
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150007972026
Filing Number
715/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
625/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
28
Police Station
MIDC
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Police Station MIDC
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abhay Sofilal Borkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 625/2026 - Police Station MIDC v. Abhay Sofilal Borkar Abhay Sofilal Borkar was found smoking in a public place at Wamdayal, MIDC on 2.9.26, in violation of Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted him under Section 252 Cr.PC and Section 21 of COTPA Act 2003, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with two days simple imprisonment in default, considering the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 625/2026
Case Summary: 625/2026 - Police Station MIDC v. Abhay Sofilal Borkar Abhay Sofilal Borkar was found smoking in a public place at Wamdayal, MIDC on 2.9.26, in violation of Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge. The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted him under Section 252 Cr.PC and Section 21 of COTPA Act 2003, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with two days simple imprisonment in default, considering the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts