Police Station MIDC vs Sudhanshu Arvind Kamble — 620/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150007922026

Filing Number

710/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

620/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sudhanshu Arvind Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 620/2026 The Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Sudhanshu Arvind Kamble under Section 252 CrPC for smoking in a public place, violating Section 4 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or undergo two days' simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 620/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 620/2026 The Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Sudhanshu Arvind Kamble under Section 252 CrPC for smoking in a public place, violating Section 4 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or undergo two days' simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case