Police Station MIDC vs Prakash Haduvan Panda — 611/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150007832026

Filing Number

701/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

611/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

1.Prakash Haduvan Panda

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case 611/2026 Summary: Prakash Haduvan Panda (age 47) was charged with smoking in a public place at CSPL Gate Road, MIDC on 6.3.26, violating Section 4 r/w 21 of the COTPA Act. The accused pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court accepted his plea and convicted him under Section 252 CrPC and Section 4/21 COTPA Act 2003, sentencing him to pay Rs. 200 fine or undergo two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 611/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 611/2026 Summary: Prakash Haduvan Panda (age 47) was charged with smoking in a public place at CSPL Gate Road, MIDC on 6.3.26, violating Section 4 r/w 21 of the COTPA Act. The accused pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court accepted his plea and convicted him under Section 252 CrPC and Section 4/21 COTPA Act 2003, sentencing him to pay Rs. 200 fine or undergo two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.