Police Station MIDC vs Lokesh Bhagwat Kawale — 607/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150007792026

Filing Number

697/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

607/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

1.Lokesh Bhagwat Kawale

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case 607/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Lokesh Bhagwat Kawale under Section 252 CrPC for smoking in a public place in violation of Section 4/21 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges on 14/03/2026. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two days, considering the nature of the offence and the accused's plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
12-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 607/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Lokesh Bhagwat Kawale under Section 252 CrPC for smoking in a public place in violation of Section 4/21 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charges on 14/03/2026. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for two days, considering the nature of the offence and the accused's plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.