Police Station MIDC vs Maroti Parasram Aalat — 596/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150007682026

Filing Number

686/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

596/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

1.Maroti Parasram Aalat

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Maroti Parasram Aalat under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 2003, for smoking in a public place on 14/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with default simple imprisonment for two days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 596/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Maroti Parasram Aalat under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act 2003, for smoking in a public place on 14/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with default simple imprisonment for two days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.