Police Station MIDC vs Amol Ramdas Tayde — 595/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150007672026

Filing Number

685/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

595/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

1.Amol Ramdas Tayde

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case 595/2026 Summary: Amol Ramdas Tayde was charged with smoking in a public place at Police Nagar, MIDC, on 14/02/2026, violating Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court accepted the guilty plea and convicted him under Section 252 Cr.PC, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or face two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 595/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 595/2026 Summary: Amol Ramdas Tayde was charged with smoking in a public place at Police Nagar, MIDC, on 14/02/2026, violating Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court accepted the guilty plea and convicted him under Section 252 Cr.PC, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or face two days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.