Police Station MIDC vs Prem Prabhu Zha — 590/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150007622026

Filing Number

680/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

590/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

1.Prem Prabhu Zha

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case 590/2026 Summary: Prem Prabhu Zha was convicted under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003 for smoking in a public place on 2.3.2026 at Central MIDC Road, Nagpur. The accused pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 and, in default, simple imprisonment for two days, considering the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 590/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 590/2026 Summary: Prem Prabhu Zha was convicted under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003 for smoking in a public place on 2.3.2026 at Central MIDC Road, Nagpur. The accused pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 and, in default, simple imprisonment for two days, considering the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.