Police Station MIDC vs Hattu Mahadev Bankar — 587/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150007592026

Filing Number

677/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

587/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

MIDC

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Police Station MIDC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hattu Mahadev Bankar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 587/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Hattu Mahadev Bankar under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003 for smoking in a public place on 2.3.26. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his plea. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with two days simple imprisonment in default, considering the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 587/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 587/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna convicted Hattu Mahadev Bankar under Section 4 read with Section 21 of the COTPA Act 2003 for smoking in a public place on 2.3.26. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his plea. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with two days simple imprisonment in default, considering the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case