P.S. Hingna vs Swapnil Shivnath Raut — 512/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150006602026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
599/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
512/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
441
Police Station
Hingana
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.S. Hingna
Respondent(s)
-
1.Swapnil Shivnath Raut
-
2.Dnyaneshvar Hiramna Hulake
Adv. null
-
3.Shankar Namdev Ashtankar
Adv. null
-
4.Dinesh Rupchand Sathavne
Adv. null
-
5.Dattu Ramdas Vanode
Adv. null
-
6.Jagadish Nagorao Bhusari
Adv. null
-
7.Harshal Ravindr Borkar
Adv. null
-
8.Jaswant Urph Bapu Bholaram Deshamukh
Adv. null
-
9.Prashant Kashna Chinchokar
Adv. null
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
17-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 512/2026 Summary In this criminal case under the Maharashtra Gambling Act, Section 12(a), the accused were charged with playing and conducting betting/gambling games in a public place. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court convicted all accused and sentenced each to imprisonment up to court discretion plus a fine of Rs. 300/-, with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. Seized materials are to be retained for proceedings against other accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 512/2026
Case 512/2026 Summary In this criminal case under the Maharashtra Gambling Act, Section 12(a), the accused were charged with playing and conducting betting/gambling games in a public place. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court convicted all accused and sentenced each to imprisonment up to court discretion plus a fine of Rs. 300/-, with an alternative imprisonment of two days if the fine remains unpaid. Seized materials are to be retained for proceedings against other accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts