P.S. Hingna vs Shyam Rajpat Gautam — 418/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150005652026

Filing Number

504/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

418/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

37

Police Station

Hingana

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 4,21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S. Hingna

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shyam Rajpat Gautam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 418/2026 Summary The accused (Shyam Rajpat Gautam) pleaded guilty to violating Section 21 of the COTPA Act, 2003. The Judicial Magistrate First Class accepted the plea and convicted him, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or, in default, undergo simple imprisonment for two days, considering the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 418/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 418/2026 Summary The accused (Shyam Rajpat Gautam) pleaded guilty to violating Section 21 of the COTPA Act, 2003. The Judicial Magistrate First Class accepted the plea and convicted him, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or, in default, undergo simple imprisonment for two days, considering the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case