Smt. Durga Wd/o Babansingh Shandilya vs Tawindersingh Mohindarsingh Rawal — 19/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 02nd May 2026.

M.J.Cases

CNR: MHNG150004922023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

27/2023

Filing Date

15-02-2023

Registration No

19/2023

Registration Date

15-02-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Durga Wd/o Babansingh Shandilya

Adv. D. R. Lamsonge

Pankajsingh S/o Babansingh Shandilya

Master Golu Babansingh Shandilya

Suraj Devisingh Shandilya

Jiwan Devisingh Shandilya

Ku. Usha Devisingh Shandilya

Smt. Usha Nepalsingh Shandilya

Dhanraj Nepalsingh Shandilya

Bhojraj Nepalsingh Shandilya

Himmat Nepalsingh Shandilya

Raju Hanumansingh Shandilya

Altaf Khan Asad Khan

Respondent(s)

Tawindersingh Mohindarsingh Rawal

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA

02-05-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Order

18-04-2026

Order

04-04-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court rejected the applicants' plea to restore Civil Suit No. 49/2013, which was dismissed for want of prosecution in 2019. The judge found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient cause for their non-appearance, citing a four-year delay without proper documentation, deceased parties with an invalid power of attorney, and selective attendance in other court proceedings suggesting deliberate negligence rather than unavoidable circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

06-12-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the applicants' plea to restore Civil Suit No. 49/2013, which was dismissed for want of prosecution in 2019. The judge found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient cause for their non-appearance, citing a four-year delay without proper documentation, deceased parties with an invalid power of attorney, and selective attendance in other court proceedings suggesting deliberate negligence rather than unavoidable circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case