State Excise Department-F2 vs Dharmpal Chhannu Pawar — 271/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150004242024
Filing Number
355/2024
Filing Date
20-Feb-2024
Registration No
271/2024
Registration Date
20-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
Hingana
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise Department-F2
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dharmpal Chhannu Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In State vs. Dharmpal, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna, stopped the proceeding under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged the accused due to the prosecution's failure to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, making it impossible to determine whether the seized article was alcoholic or non-alcoholic under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court also ordered recall of the pending warrant, return of seized liquor to the Excise Department, and return of any seized vehicle to its registered owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
15-Dec-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
16-Sep-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
17-Jun-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
18-Mar-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Dec-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
06-Sep-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Jun-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Apr-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 271/2024
Summary: In State vs. Dharmpal, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna, stopped the proceeding under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged the accused due to the prosecution's failure to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, making it impossible to determine whether the seized article was alcoholic or non-alcoholic under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court also ordered recall of the pending warrant, return of seized liquor to the Excise Department, and return of any seized vehicle to its registered owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts