State Excise Department-F2 vs Satish Vijay Bhoyar — 266/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150004192024
Filing Number
350/2024
Filing Date
20-Feb-2024
Registration No
266/2024
Registration Date
20-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
Hingana
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise Department-F2
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Satish Vijay Bhoyar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The JMFC Hingna discharged accused Satish under Section 258 CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding the prosecution failed to file the chemical analysis report necessary to establish whether the seized article was alcoholic. The court stopped proceedings and ordered recall of the warrant, with seized liquor to be disposed by the Excise Department and any seized vehicle returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
15-Dec-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
16-Sep-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
17-Jun-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
18-Mar-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Dec-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
06-Sep-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Jun-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Apr-2024
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
-
20-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 266/2024
Summary The JMFC Hingna discharged accused Satish under Section 258 CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding the prosecution failed to file the chemical analysis report necessary to establish whether the seized article was alcoholic. The court stopped proceedings and ordered recall of the warrant, with seized liquor to be disposed by the Excise Department and any seized vehicle returned to its owner after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts