P.S. Hingna vs Ashpakh Nammu Miya Pathan Advocate - Bhushan Naik — 75/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354-A,354-A(3),294,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG150003452022
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
02-02-2022
Filing Number
313/2022
Filing Date
02-02-2022
Registration No
75/2022
Registration Date
02-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
FIR Details
FIR Number
575
Police Station
Hingana
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S. Hingna
Respondent(s)
Ashpakh Nammu Miya Pathan Advocate - Bhushan Naik
Raju Mahadeorao Badge
Adv. Bhushan Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (FIR No. 575/2021) registered under IPC Sections 354-A(1)(iii), 354, 294, and IT Act Section 67 involving charges of sexual harassment and obscene communication. The court dismissed the accused's revision petition challenging the police investigation and evidence collection procedures. The petition was rejected as the court found no procedural irregularities in the mobile phone seizure, examination, or witness statements recorded during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (FIR No. 575/2021) registered under IPC Sections 354-A(1)(iii), 354, 294, and IT Act Section 67 involving charges of sexual harassment and obscene communication. The court dismissed the accused's revision petition challenging the police investigation and evidence collection procedures. The petition was rejected as the court found no procedural irregularities in the mobile phone seizure, examination, or witness statements recorded during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts