Excise Department E-1 Division Wadi, Nagpur vs Tulsabai Duryodhan Dhanvijay — 25/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150000452023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
42/2023
Filing Date
05-01-2023
Registration No
25/2023
Registration Date
05-01-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Excise Department E-1 Division Wadi, Nagpur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tulsabai Duryodhan Dhanvijay
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 11-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 20-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court discharged accused Tulsabai Duryodhan Dhanvijay, charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, due to absence of a Chemical Analyzer report on record. The Judicial Magistrate found that without this crucial evidence, the accused could not be convicted even with other witness testimony, and discontinued proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court discharged accused Tulsabai Duryodhan Dhanvijay, charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, due to absence of a Chemical Analyzer report on record. The Judicial Magistrate found that without this crucial evidence, the accused could not be convicted even with other witness testimony, and discontinued proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts