State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Roshan Mahadeo Surkar — 331/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140005482025
Filing Number
513/2025
Filing Date
29-08-2025
Registration No
331/2025
Registration Date
29-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
228
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Respondent(s)
Roshan Mahadeo Surkar
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Lok-Nyayalaya
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 01-11-2025 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 13-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 331/2025 Summary: Roshan Mahadev Surkar, a 32-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his SUMO vehicle obstructively on a public road at Pench Phata, Parseoni on 17/05/2025, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 331/2025 Summary: Roshan Mahadev Surkar, a 32-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his SUMO vehicle obstructively on a public road at Pench Phata, Parseoni on 17/05/2025, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts