State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Suresh Santosh Uikey — 292/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140004922025
Filing Number
458/2025
Filing Date
12-08-2025
Registration No
292/2025
Registration Date
12-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
209
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Suresh Santosh Uikey
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 07-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Suresh Santosh Uikey (SCC 292/2025) Suresh Santosh Uikey, a 40-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle on Pench Road, Parseoni on May 5, 2025, in a manner that obstructed public passage. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him. The court, considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's lack of criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine with one day simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Suresh Santosh Uikey (SCC 292/2025) Suresh Santosh Uikey, a 40-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle on Pench Road, Parseoni on May 5, 2025, in a manner that obstructed public passage. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him. The court, considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's lack of criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine with one day simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts