State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Shubham Hemraj Paunikar — 146/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140002142026

Filing Number

206/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

146/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

163

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Hemraj Paunikar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 146/2026 The First Class Magistrate Court at Parshivni convicted Shubham Hemraj Paunikar under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a vehicle (MH-35-AG-9456) in an uncontrolled and reckless manner while intoxicated on 04/03/2026, endangering public safety. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense; considering mitigating factors including his poor economic background and it being his first offense, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹10,000 instead of imprisonment, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 146/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 146/2026 The First Class Magistrate Court at Parshivni convicted Shubham Hemraj Paunikar under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a vehicle (MH-35-AG-9456) in an uncontrolled and reckless manner while intoxicated on 04/03/2026, endangering public safety. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense; considering mitigating factors including his poor economic background and it being his first offense, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹10,000 instead of imprisonment, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case