State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Sagar Sheshrao Lanjewar — 141/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140002092026

Filing Number

201/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

141/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sagar Sheshrao Lanjewar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The court convicted 26-year-old Sagar Sheshrao Lanjewar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle in a manner that obstructed public passage at Palora Fata Chowk, Parseoni on 01/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 400 (or one day simple imprisonment in default), with the court showing leniency based on his lack of prior criminal record and financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 141/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court convicted 26-year-old Sagar Sheshrao Lanjewar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle in a manner that obstructed public passage at Palora Fata Chowk, Parseoni on 01/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 400 (or one day simple imprisonment in default), with the court showing leniency based on his lack of prior criminal record and financial circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case