State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Rakesh Lalaji Giri — 140/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140002082026

Filing Number

200/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

140/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

155

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Lalaji Giri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 140/2026 Summary: The court convicted Rakesh Lalaji Giri under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his pickup vehicle in an obstructive manner at Palora Fata Chowk, Parseoni on 01/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges; the court accepted his plea and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) due to his financial hardship and clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 140/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 140/2026 Summary: The court convicted Rakesh Lalaji Giri under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his pickup vehicle in an obstructive manner at Palora Fata Chowk, Parseoni on 01/03/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges; the court accepted his plea and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) due to his financial hardship and clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case