State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Rakesh Sheshrao Shinde — 139/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140002072026
Filing Number
199/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
139/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rakesh Sheshrao Shinde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 139/2026 Summary: Rakesh Sheshrao Shinde, a 29-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TAVERA vehicle (MH-31-DC5625) in an obstructive manner on Nayakund Puliya Road, Parseoni on 21/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charge was explained to him. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the minor nature of the offense and the accused's lack of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 139/2026
Case 139/2026 Summary: Rakesh Sheshrao Shinde, a 29-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TAVERA vehicle (MH-31-DC5625) in an obstructive manner on Nayakund Puliya Road, Parseoni on 21/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charge was explained to him. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the minor nature of the offense and the accused's lack of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts