State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Mohammad Arif Rashid Khan — 135/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140002032026

Filing Number

195/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

135/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Arif Rashid Khan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 135/2026 Summary Mohammad Arif Rashid Khan, a 40-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his TATA WINGER vehicle (MH40-BG-5332) in an obstructive manner on a public road in Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean criminal record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 135/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 135/2026 Summary Mohammad Arif Rashid Khan, a 40-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his TATA WINGER vehicle (MH40-BG-5332) in an obstructive manner on a public road in Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean criminal record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case