State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Nana Sampat Amale — 134/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140002022026

Filing Number

194/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

134/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nana Sampat Amale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 134/2026 The First Class Magistrate at Parshivni found defendant Nana Sampat Amale guilty of driving vehicle MH40-J-7103 under the influence of alcohol on 28/01/2026, creating danger to the public, thereby violating Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Considering his poverty and first-time conviction, the court imposed a fine of ₹10,000 instead of imprisonment, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment for non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 134/2026 The First Class Magistrate at Parshivni found defendant Nana Sampat Amale guilty of driving vehicle MH40-J-7103 under the influence of alcohol on 28/01/2026, creating danger to the public, thereby violating Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense. Considering his poverty and first-time conviction, the court imposed a fine of ₹10,000 instead of imprisonment, with 15 days simple imprisonment as default punishment for non-payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case