State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Raju Babulalji Ahake — 122/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001852026
Filing Number
177/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
122/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
131
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Raju Babulalji Ahake
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SCC No. 122/2026, State of Maharashtra v. Raju Babulalji Ahake The court convicted Raju Babulalji Ahake under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his auto-rickshaw (MH-31-FB-2590) at Parseoni Bus Stop in a manner obstructing public passage on 22/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and admitted to the obstruction. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCC No. 122/2026, State of Maharashtra v. Raju Babulalji Ahake The court convicted Raju Babulalji Ahake under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his auto-rickshaw (MH-31-FB-2590) at Parseoni Bus Stop in a manner obstructing public passage on 22/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and admitted to the obstruction. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts