State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Munnalal Ramji Gupta — 121/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001842026
Filing Number
176/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
121/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
114
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Munnalal Ramji Gupta
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Munnalal Ramji Gupta (SCC 121/2026) The accused, a 47-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his pickup vehicle on Nayakund Puliya road in a manner causing obstruction to public passage on 16/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his submission that he is a poor person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Munnalal Ramji Gupta (SCC 121/2026) The accused, a 47-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his pickup vehicle on Nayakund Puliya road in a manner causing obstruction to public passage on 16/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his submission that he is a poor person. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts