State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Rajjat Alias Shekhar Ramesh Godale — 120/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001832026

Filing Number

175/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajjat Alias Shekhar Ramesh Godale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The accused, Rajjat (19-year-old driver), was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA MAGIC vehicle in a manner obstructing public passage on 12/02/2026. He pleaded guilty to the charge. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 400, with one day simple imprisonment as default, considering his clean record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The accused, Rajjat (19-year-old driver), was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA MAGIC vehicle in a manner obstructing public passage on 12/02/2026. He pleaded guilty to the charge. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 400, with one day simple imprisonment as default, considering his clean record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case