State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote — 118/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001812026
Filing Number
173/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
118/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: SCC No. 118/2026 The court convicted Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle in a manner that obstructed public passage on 22/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's financial hardship, and his clean criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2026
Case Summary: SCC No. 118/2026 The court convicted Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle in a manner that obstructed public passage on 22/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's financial hardship, and his clean criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts