State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote — 118/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001812026

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

130

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC No. 118/2026 The court convicted Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle in a manner that obstructed public passage on 22/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's financial hardship, and his clean criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 118/2026 The court convicted Murlidhar Ramkrushna Dhote under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle in a manner that obstructed public passage on 22/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's financial hardship, and his clean criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case