State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Dhanraj Jangluji Kalsarpe — 114/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001772026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

114/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

1.Dhanraj Jangluji Kalsarpe

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
09-May-2026

Copy of JudgmentView PDF

Dhanraj Jangluji Kalsarpe, a 54-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his pickup vehicle (MH-40-CT-1334) at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 17/02/2026, obstructing public passage. The court accepted his guilty plea and imposed lenient punishment of ₹400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) due to his admission, clean criminal record, and poor financial status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
09-May-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
14-Mar-2026

Lok-Nyayalaya

Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
06-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 114/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Dhanraj Jangluji Kalsarpe, a 54-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his pickup vehicle (MH-40-CT-1334) at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 17/02/2026, obstructing public passage. The court accepted his guilty plea and imposed lenient punishment of ₹400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) due to his admission, clean criminal record, and poor financial status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.