State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Vikash Ruprao Sahare — 113/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001762026

Case disposed

Filing Number

168/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

113/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

FIR Details

FIR Number

115

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Vikash Ruprao Sahare

Hearing History

Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Lok-Nyayalaya

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary (SCC No. 113/2026): The Judicial Magistrate convicted Vikash Ruprao Sahare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA ACE vehicle (MH-31-DS-0336) in an obstructive manner on a public road at Palora Fata, Parseoni on 16 February 2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offence, his lack of prior criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (SCC No. 113/2026): The Judicial Magistrate convicted Vikash Ruprao Sahare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA ACE vehicle (MH-31-DS-0336) in an obstructive manner on a public road at Palora Fata, Parseoni on 16 February 2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offence, his lack of prior criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case