State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Vikash Ruprao Sahare — 113/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001762026
Filing Number
168/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
113/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
115
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vikash Ruprao Sahare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary (SCC No. 113/2026): The Judicial Magistrate convicted Vikash Ruprao Sahare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA ACE vehicle (MH-31-DS-0336) in an obstructive manner on a public road at Palora Fata, Parseoni on 16 February 2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offence, his lack of prior criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 113/2026
Case Summary (SCC No. 113/2026): The Judicial Magistrate convicted Vikash Ruprao Sahare under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA ACE vehicle (MH-31-DS-0336) in an obstructive manner on a public road at Palora Fata, Parseoni on 16 February 2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering the minor nature of the offence, his lack of prior criminal antecedents, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts