State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Aniket Ishwar Bhoyar — 107/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001702026
Filing Number
162/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
107/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Aniket Ishwar Bhoyar
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 04-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Aniket Ishwar Bhoyar (SCC 107/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted 22-year-old Aniket Ishwar Bhoyar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle at MG College Parseoni on 13 February 2026 in a manner obstructing public passage. The accused pleaded guilty without contest. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), citing the accused's lack of prior criminal record and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Aniket Ishwar Bhoyar (SCC 107/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted 22-year-old Aniket Ishwar Bhoyar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle at MG College Parseoni on 13 February 2026 in a manner obstructing public passage. The accused pleaded guilty without contest. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), citing the accused's lack of prior criminal record and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts