State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Pradip Madhukar Bhoyar — 106/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001692026

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

106/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Madhukar Bhoyar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 106/2026 Summary: Pradip Madhukar Bhoyar, a 40-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his TATA ACE vehicle (MH-40-AC-6745) in an obstructive manner at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 11/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court convicted him and, considering his clean record and plea for leniency, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 106/2026 Summary: Pradip Madhukar Bhoyar, a 40-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his TATA ACE vehicle (MH-40-AC-6745) in an obstructive manner at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 11/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court convicted him and, considering his clean record and plea for leniency, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case