State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Yogiraj Pitambar Khobragade — 98/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001612026
Filing Number
153/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yogiraj Pitambar Khobragade
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Yogiraj Pitambar Khobragade (SCC 98/2026) The accused, a 48-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni in a manner that obstructed public passage. The accused pleaded guilty after the particulars were explained to him. The court, considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his financial hardship, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). The matter was disposed of finally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
14-Mar-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2026
Case Summary: State v. Yogiraj Pitambar Khobragade (SCC 98/2026) The accused, a 48-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni in a manner that obstructed public passage. The accused pleaded guilty after the particulars were explained to him. The court, considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his financial hardship, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). The matter was disposed of finally. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts