State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Pradip Rajkumar Inwate — 86/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001462026

Filing Number

139/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Rajkumar Inwate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State vs. Pradip Rajkumar Inwate (86/2026) The accused pleaded guilty to parking his four-wheeler vehicle at Amdi Fata, Parseoni on 09/02/2026 in a manner causing obstruction to public passage, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense and his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State vs. Pradip Rajkumar Inwate (86/2026) The accused pleaded guilty to parking his four-wheeler vehicle at Amdi Fata, Parseoni on 09/02/2026 in a manner causing obstruction to public passage, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense and his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case