State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Nitesh Rajendraprasad Gupta — 80/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001402026
Filing Number
133/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
80/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nitesh Rajendraprasad Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 80/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Nitesh Rajendraprasad Gupta under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his SUMO vehicle in a manner obstructing public passage on 08/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and submitted to punishment. Considering the minor nature of the offense, lack of criminal antecedents, and the accused's financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 80/2026
Case 80/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Nitesh Rajendraprasad Gupta under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his SUMO vehicle in a manner obstructing public passage on 08/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty and submitted to punishment. Considering the minor nature of the offense, lack of criminal antecedents, and the accused's financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts