State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Baba Dharamdas Patil — 79/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001392026
Filing Number
132/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
79/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Baba Dharamdas Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: SCC No. 79/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Baba Dharamdas Patil under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle on the Parseoni-Saoner road in a manner causing obstruction to public traffic on 08/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, the court imposed a lenient punishment of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCC No. 79/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Baba Dharamdas Patil under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle on the Parseoni-Saoner road in a manner causing obstruction to public traffic on 08/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, the court imposed a lenient punishment of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts