State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Baba Dharamdas Patil — 79/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001392026

Filing Number

132/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Baba Dharamdas Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC No. 79/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Baba Dharamdas Patil under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle on the Parseoni-Saoner road in a manner causing obstruction to public traffic on 08/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, the court imposed a lenient punishment of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 79/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Baba Dharamdas Patil under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle on the Parseoni-Saoner road in a manner causing obstruction to public traffic on 08/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, the court imposed a lenient punishment of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case