State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Mukesh Vithoba Barve — 76/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001362026

Case disposed

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

FIR Details

FIR Number

109

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Mukesh Vithoba Barve

Hearing History

Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

14-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Lok-Nyayalaya

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mukesh Vithoba Barve (76/2026) Mukesh Vithoba Barve, a 65-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle at MG College, Parseoni in a manner that obstructed public navigation on 13/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in the vernacular. The court accepted the guilty plea and, considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mukesh Vithoba Barve (76/2026) Mukesh Vithoba Barve, a 65-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle at MG College, Parseoni in a manner that obstructed public navigation on 13/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in the vernacular. The court accepted the guilty plea and, considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case