State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Mukesh Vithoba Barve — 76/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001362026
Filing Number
129/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
76/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Mukesh Vithoba Barve
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mukesh Vithoba Barve (76/2026) Mukesh Vithoba Barve, a 65-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle at MG College, Parseoni in a manner that obstructed public navigation on 13/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in the vernacular. The court accepted the guilty plea and, considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mukesh Vithoba Barve (76/2026) Mukesh Vithoba Barve, a 65-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle at MG College, Parseoni in a manner that obstructed public navigation on 13/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty after the charges were explained to him in the vernacular. The court accepted the guilty plea and, considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing poverty, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts