State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Omprakash Ranjit Perteti — 75/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001352026
Filing Number
128/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
75/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Omprakash Ranjit Perteti
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State vs. Omprakash (SCC No. 75/2026) The court convicted 20-year-old driver Omprakash Ranjit Perteti under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his pickup vehicle obstructing public passage near Nayakund Puliya, Parseoni on 14/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty without contest. The magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his poverty plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 75/2026
Case Summary: State vs. Omprakash (SCC No. 75/2026) The court convicted 20-year-old driver Omprakash Ranjit Perteti under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his pickup vehicle obstructing public passage near Nayakund Puliya, Parseoni on 14/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty without contest. The magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his poverty plea. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts