State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Mahesh Meghraj Hajare — 73/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001332026

Filing Number

126/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

73/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

    Adv. App

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahesh Meghraj Hajare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC No. 73/2026 Mahesh Meghraj Hajare, a 38-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his pickup vehicle in an obstructive manner at Nayakund Puliya, Parseoni on 13/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a fine of Rs. 400 (with one day simple imprisonment as default), citing his clean criminal record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 73/2026 Mahesh Meghraj Hajare, a 38-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his pickup vehicle in an obstructive manner at Nayakund Puliya, Parseoni on 13/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a fine of Rs. 400 (with one day simple imprisonment as default), citing his clean criminal record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case