State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Mangesh Hukum Kuhite — 72/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140001322026
Filing Number
125/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
72/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
101
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mangesh Hukum Kuhite
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: SCC No. 72/2026 - State vs. Mangesh Hukum Kuhite The accused was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle (MH-36-0889) in an obstructive manner on a public way at Nayakund Puliya, Parseoni on 13/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 72/2026
Case Summary: SCC No. 72/2026 - State vs. Mangesh Hukum Kuhite The accused was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his TATA SUMO vehicle (MH-36-0889) in an obstructive manner on a public way at Nayakund Puliya, Parseoni on 13/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency citing financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts