State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Indrapal Natthuji Bajanghate — 68/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001282026

Filing Number

121/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

1.Indrapal Natthuji Bajanghate

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Copy of JudgmentView PDF

Case Summary: State v. Indrapal (68/2026) The court convicted Indrapal Natthuji Bajanghate under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his Bolero pickup vehicle at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 12/02/2026 in a manner obstructing public passage. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
24-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 68/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Indrapal (68/2026) The court convicted Indrapal Natthuji Bajanghate under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, for parking his Bolero pickup vehicle at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 12/02/2026 in a manner obstructing public passage. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. Considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean criminal record, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine, with one day simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.