State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Rashtrapal Fattuji Atram — 48/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140001022026

Filing Number

96/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

48/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

1.Rashtrapal Fattuji Atram

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Copy of JudgmentView PDF

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rashtrapal Fattuji Atram (48/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rashtrapal Fattuji Atram for parking his auto-rickshaw in a manner obstructing public passage at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 10/02/2026, in violation of Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean criminal record and impoverished status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
18-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
18-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 48/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rashtrapal Fattuji Atram (48/2026) The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rashtrapal Fattuji Atram for parking his auto-rickshaw in a manner obstructing public passage at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 10/02/2026, in violation of Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean criminal record and impoverished status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.