State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Babalu Ramdasji Raut — 45/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000992026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
45/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babalu Ramdasji Raut
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Babalu Ramdasji Raut (SCC 45/2026) The accused, a 26-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to obstructing a public way by parking his TATA ACE vehicle at Navegaon Khairi chowk, Parseoni on 05/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default) after considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2026
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Babalu Ramdasji Raut (SCC 45/2026) The accused, a 26-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to obstructing a public way by parking his TATA ACE vehicle at Navegaon Khairi chowk, Parseoni on 05/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default) after considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts