State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Babalu Ramdasji Raut — 45/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG140000992026

Case disposed

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni

Judge

14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Parshioni

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Babalu Ramdasji Raut

Hearing History

Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.

14-03-2026

Disposed

18-02-2026

Lok-Nyayalaya

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Babalu Ramdasji Raut (SCC 45/2026) The accused, a 26-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to obstructing a public way by parking his TATA ACE vehicle at Navegaon Khairi chowk, Parseoni on 05/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default) after considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Babalu Ramdasji Raut (SCC 45/2026) The accused, a 26-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to obstructing a public way by parking his TATA ACE vehicle at Navegaon Khairi chowk, Parseoni on 05/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default) after considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case