State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000942026
Filing Number
88/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar (40/2026) Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar, a 32-year-old driver, was charged with obstructing a public way by parking his TATA Magic vehicle at Saoner Road Pipeline Chowk, Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge and submitted he was ready to undergo punishment. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2026
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar (40/2026) Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar, a 32-year-old driver, was charged with obstructing a public way by parking his TATA Magic vehicle at Saoner Road Pipeline Chowk, Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge and submitted he was ready to undergo punishment. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts