State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000942026
Filing Number
88/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 16-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar (40/2026) Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar, a 32-year-old driver, was charged with obstructing a public way by parking his TATA Magic vehicle at Saoner Road Pipeline Chowk, Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge and submitted he was ready to undergo punishment. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar (40/2026) Pankaj Shankar Kumbhalkar, a 32-year-old driver, was charged with obstructing a public way by parking his TATA Magic vehicle at Saoner Road Pipeline Chowk, Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty to the charge and submitted he was ready to undergo punishment. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), considering his clean record and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts