State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Praful Moreshwar Bhoyar — 39/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000932026
Filing Number
87/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
39/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Praful Moreshwar Bhoyar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Praful Moreshwar Bhoyar (39/2026) Praful Moreshwar Bhoyar, a 34-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his TATA Winger vehicle (MH-08-R-7775) in an obstructive manner opposite Tahsil Karyalay Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the minor nature of the offense and his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2026
Case Summary: State v. Praful Moreshwar Bhoyar (39/2026) Praful Moreshwar Bhoyar, a 34-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to parking his TATA Winger vehicle (MH-08-R-7775) in an obstructive manner opposite Tahsil Karyalay Parseoni on 03/02/2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The court convicted him and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the minor nature of the offense and his clean criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts