State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Vilash Ramesh Nagpure — 38/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000922026
Filing Number
86/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Vilash Ramesh Nagpure
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 16-02-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vilas Ramesh Nagpure (SCC No. 38/2026) Vilas Ramesh Nagpure, a 23-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his OMNI vehicle at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 02/02/2026 in a manner obstructing public traffic. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his plea after ensuring he understood the charges and prescribed punishment. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 400, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering his clean record and poor financial circumstances warranting leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vilas Ramesh Nagpure (SCC No. 38/2026) Vilas Ramesh Nagpure, a 23-year-old driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his OMNI vehicle at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 02/02/2026 in a manner obstructing public traffic. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his plea after ensuring he understood the charges and prescribed punishment. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 400, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering his clean record and poor financial circumstances warranting leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts