State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni vs Dipak Umrao Ukey — 37/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG140000912026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Parseoni
Judge
14-Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
Parshioni
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Parseoni
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dipak Umrao Ukey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: SCC No. 37/2026 - State vs. Dipak Umrao Ukey Dipak Umrao Ukey, a 31-year-old bus driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle (MH-40-Y-7406) at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 02/02/2026, causing obstruction to public way navigation. The accused pleaded guilty after understanding the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean record, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jr.Dn J.M.F.C.Parshioni.
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2026
Case Summary: SCC No. 37/2026 - State vs. Dipak Umrao Ukey Dipak Umrao Ukey, a 31-year-old bus driver, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for parking his vehicle (MH-40-Y-7406) at Shivaji Chowk, Parseoni on 02/02/2026, causing obstruction to public way navigation. The accused pleaded guilty after understanding the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 400 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) considering the minor nature of the offense, the accused's clean record, and his plea for leniency based on financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts